This isn’t Splat!
In Steve Wyborney’s Splat!, the total number of dots is given and the number of dots under each splat is unknown. In my Paint Splatter Arrays, the total number of dots is unknown. My paint splatters do cover some dots but how many is beside the point. Also, Steve’s dots are scattered; mine are arranged in arrays. (More on that below.) Steve’s splats splat. My splatters are there from the get-go. See? Not the same.
h/t Andrew Stadel
Here’s why I created this activity…
T: “How many do you see?”
T: “How do you see them?”
S: “Two, four, six, …”
Every. Single. Time.
Not all students. Most students do see and use groups or arrays to figure out how many. Those strategies are described in this post. But some students don’t seem to make sense of others’ ideas. That’s a greater challenge than I’ll tackle here. (Recommended: Intentional Talk by Elham Kazemi and Allison Hintz.) Instead, I designed the activity above to (gently) shove students towards looking for and making use of arrays.
The first three are softballs. For example, the second:
Students can still see each dot and count all by ones or twos. But a more efficient strategy is to see 3 × 5 (3 rows, 5 columns).
The next several slides completely cover at least one dot, so students can’t count all by counting what they can see. In each, at least one complete row and one complete column is visible. For example:
I had some fun with the last two. In the next-to-last one, the middle column is completely concealed.
In the last one, most of the dots are hidden. A bit of estimation. How many?
How confident are you?
What about now?
I test-drove these on my daughters. (Keira likes Booger Math! over Paint Splatter Arrays, by the way. It is catchier.) I’m looking forward to trying this out in Surrey classrooms. Feedback welcome!
And mine goes ding ding ding di di ding ding DING ding ding ding di di ding ding.